Magic: the Gathering

Opinion

Modern: Is Ragavan becoming obsolete for the format?

, Comment regular icon0 comments

Previously considered one of the most broken cards in Modern Horizons II and a mandatory staple for the format, could the recent changes in the Modern Metagame make Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer obsolete?

Writer image

translated by Romeu

Writer image

revised by Tabata Marques

Edit Article

This article began while playing a Domain Zoo Magic Online League. As I moved into Game 2, a trend began to repeat itself in my Sideboard plan: copies of Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer were constantly being cut as more relevant cards came in because it didn't seem relevant enough, or was easy for our opponent to respond to with favorable trades.

The next day, as I was writing my Sideboard guide, rereading my notes, I noticed how this pattern repeated itself. I started analyzing my games with other archetypes that I have experience with and which run Ragavan, and the result was very similar: copies of it were coming out against most of the main decks in the current Metagame.

Ad

Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer started to look essential in Game 1 due to its potential to tale over games against unknown opponents, but in the current conditions and strategies prevailing in the current Modern, it may be losing space in post-sideboard games. Had he, once considered one of the most broken cards in Modern Horizons II, started to become obsolete for the format?

Ragavan and the Modern Metagame

Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer was a pillar in Modern and one of the most played cards in the format, with around 35% of the Metagame share and second only to Chalice of the Void and Endurance, two key pieces to combat the main archetype responsible for its popularity: the Izzet Murktide.

Loading icon

Since Modern Horizons II came out and except when there was an imbalance in the format, Izzet Murktide was considered the best competitive deck in the Metagame even when it was not at the top of the results, as it had longevity in remaining among the top five archetypes of the competitive scene, making it a solid choice for any player looking for consistent long-term results.

Murktide was not the only strategy responsible for Ragavan's popularity: Rakdos Midrange (and later Rakdos Evoke), Death's Shadow, Izzet Breach, Jund Saga, Grinding Breach and Jeskai Stoneblade were other decks where it was present, almost always with four copies, and at least a third of them pulled consistent results in Leagues and Challenges.

But one day, the Middle Lands brought its nemesis and, consequently, its downfall.

Orcish Bowmasters and Positive Value

Ragavan and Izzet Murktide's downfall began with the release of a multi-format staple in Lord of the Rings: Tales of Middle-earth.

Loading icon

Orcish Bowmasters is considered one of the best and worst cards ever created for eternal formats in a long while.

On the one hand, it's an excellent check even against the excessive dominance of blue archetypes in Legacy for a time by punishing the format's main method of sculpting hands: cantrips - and did the same in Modern by becoming the direct punishment the format needed to reduce the consistency with which Izzet Murktide remained at the top.

On the other, it is a huge limiter for countless creatures with one toughness in competitive Magic, and limits entire archetypes merely by existing in some formats. If playing with small threats was already difficult in an environment where power level and value go hand in hand, now it was much worse because your opponent could respond with two threats or blockers and still kill one of your creatures.

Loading icon

Despite greatly limiting the space of X/1s, Bowmasters came out as the perfect answer against Ragavan, which became a staple because any trade against it needed to be immediate or were net positive for its controller.

The Orcs put an end to this logic. Now, in addition to dealing with the monkey, the opponent had two bodies in play to pressure or block and still punished their cantrips - it's a bit much for its cost, but it's precisely what the eternal formats needed to create a balance.

Ad

The balance, however, was short-lived in Modern.

Loading icon

Now with the ability to respond to Izzet Murktide's top filtering and card selection, Rakdos Evoke had become the best deck in the format through a powerful combination of Modern Horizons II's Elementals with cheap reanimation effects, with ETB effects which easily exhausted the opponent's resources while leaving a powerful threat on the battlefield.

Evoke also became the best Ragavan deck, as it could run the monkey alongside Orcish Bowmasters, in addition to being able to keep the path clear for him with Fury and Feign Death.

The Metagame Has Changed and Ragavan Doesn't Fit That Much

Loading icon

On December 4th Fury was banned from Modern, and in addition to the clear hit on Rakdos Evoke, its departure also changed the competitive scene by favoring archetypes with small creatures a bit more, giving greater space to Golgari Yawgmoth, one of the worst matchups to have Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer in your deck.

Loading icon

Since then, the Metagame has adapted with each new addition to the format lately, with the inclusion of Tishana's Tidebinder in Temur Rhinos and the brief rise of Merfolks, Agatha's Soul Cauldron leveraging Golgari Yawgmoth and Hardened Scales and, more recently, Leyline of the Guildpact turning Scion of Draco into a viable win condition outside of Domain lists.

These shifts towards more linear strategies saw archetypes like Amulet Titan, Living End and Tron grow in presence, and even Indomitable Creativity combo, which disappeared from the format with the release of The One Ring, had a return to the scenario as a response to Scion of Draco - and the one who loses in this scenario, despite presenting good results in midranges such as Rakdos Evoke and Izzet Murktide, is Ragavan, as it requires at least one favorable condition to be worth a slot in the matchup:

  • The opponent must have problems interacting with him at the start of the game to the point where his advantage in mana and cards puts his controller far ahead.

  • The cards “stolen” by him are useful for their controller, serving to interact with their game plan and/or disrupt the opponent's strategy.

  • The game extends to the point where a Ragavan from the top can find an empty, unobstructed board to use his Dash ability, gaining more resources each turn.

  • In the worst-case scenario, he can trade against most creatures if the opponent decides to block him.

    Loading icon

    If we compare these conditions with the current Modern, we have these:

  • Ragavan is easily stopped by Crashing Footfalls tokens and requires a certain amount of effort to take advantage of its cards. The mana advantage is mitigated, as it is difficult to overcome between eight and ten power in a single turn.

    Ad

  • He is historically terrible against Golgari Yawgmoth and has become even worse now due to Orcish Bowmasters.

  • While it does establish some pressure in the first few turns against Amulet Titan, this deck manages to ignore what we're doing to force its own game plan, as well as lock it down for good with Arboreal Grazer and bypass it with Primeval Titan. The same logic can be applied to Tron, where the value generated by Ragavan is negligible.

  • The same logic applies to Living End: it serves to pressure, but we didn't make good use of it due to this archetype's potential to reset the battlefield with its key card. Its extra mana, however, is used to cast other threats and keep counterspells available.

  • Hammer Time and Hardened Scales can ignore Ragavan while establishing their game plans, as well as creating enough bodies to hold back its aggression if necessary. Domain Zoo fits into the same category, and the three decks still have the problem of not taking advantage of most of their cards.

  • Ragavan is an okay choice against Burn because we can take advantage of its creatures and some spells, in addition to it blocking Goblin Guide at critical moments. It is also decent against strategies with less impact on the format today, such as Death's Shadow, Izzet Breach and Gruul Assault Loam

  • Ragavan is excellent in Midrange mirrors, even more so if it is in the same colors and/or if your cards share at least one color. However, it generates negative value against Orcish Bowmasters, so it only really shines against Izzet Murktide and Goodstuff stacks, especially if they start the game with a bad land sequencing.

    With recent changes to the format and its return to less interactive strategies, Ragavan has become worse because the value it extracts in many games is easy to overlook and/or has little impact as its opponents are trying to do more absurd things on their turns - the same fate that many other Modern staples have experienced.

    Ragavan is still great in Game 1

    This doesn't mean it's time to just run other things in its place: Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer is still a low-cost threat that demands an immediate answer to avoid taking over a game, especially in an unknown Metagame.

    From local events to Regional Championships, the Modern environment is very diverse and very open and the results that emerge in Challenges and other events will not always be a perfect reflection of what you will face in the coming weeks - and no matter how stale Ragavan stays as the Metagame evolves, it will still be a viable option and almost mandatory in Game 1 for most midranges in the format.

    Its current position may only be a temporary detour until new responses take Modern back to an environment where attrition-based strategies need to compete for the best deck title, greatly increasing Ragavan's value for each game.

    On the other hand, the more linear the format becomes, the less important Ragavan will be, but until there is a threat as good as him for the same cost or there comes a point where Orcish Bowmasters becomes even more prevalent, I can't imagine the Rakdos Evoke or Izzet Murktide taking it from the maindeck in the coming months.

    Ad

    New Horizons approach

    But the future is uncertain.

    While we debate the space of Magic's most famous monkey in the competitive scene, there are only a few months left until the preview season for Modern Horizons III begins. With it, there is the possibility of another power creep wave taking over Modern and significantly changing the best decks.

    The possibilities of this expansion remain unknown. Perhaps the one-drop that will replace Ragavan in the main Midranges will appear sooner than we imagine or, perhaps, the answers needed for his triumphant return are just a quarter away.

    Until then, we'd like to hear your thoughts: has Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer's reign come to an end and made him obsolete at Modern? Or would it just be a temporary dip due to a Metagame where he can't position himself as well as he used to before Fury's ban?

    Thanks for reading!